Re: Testing call this Monday

On 04/01/2011 08:41 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:04 +0200, Ms2ger wrote:
>>>> Ah, that's indeed what you said. Are you aware of
>>>> <>?
>>> Nope, I wasn't. It seems to be feature equivalent to [1], ie it can run
>>> self describing and script based. Am I correct? Did you give some
>>> thoughts about extending it for reftests?
>> Oh, I never even realised that [1] gathered results automatically. I've
>> got basic support for reftests, for example at [2].
> nice! I was also thinking we could use canvas to do the comparison
> automatically but looking at canvas 2d, I don't see anything that let
> use just copy the rendering of a page in a canvas.
> Can you also run the html5lib parser tests as well in your framework?

I assume it would be doable, but I haven't yet spent the time needed to 
actually implement it.


Received on Friday, 1 April 2011 21:28:54 UTC