Re: Google pushing for a choice for publishers to opt-out ... in Australia

Thanks a lot, Tzviya, for the precisions and link to the minutes. 

This W3C GAI CG seems to cover a wide area of subjects. I'm wondering about the intersection between this GAI CG and our TDMRep CG. 
We created the TDMRep CG because there was a precise need triggered by EU laws. We now see that the interest around TDM and opt-out  (as defined by EU Commission) is somewhat superseded by an international interest in Generative AI in its multiple aspects; one narrow aspect being opt-out.

This leads to a question for the TDMRep participants: how should we "globalize" our work, knowing that laws are quite different in different parts of the world? 

Best regards
Laurent


> Le 14 sept. 2023 à 17:31, Siegman, Tzviya <tsiegman@wiley.com> a écrit :
> 
> There was some interesting discussion in the room. I think that one person in particular was concerned about that. There were no people from Google (or Meta or AWS) who work on GAI, so they can’t have been expected to represent them. Nick Doty, from the Center for Democracy and Technology, and Max Gendler, from NewsCorp, made a lot of interesting points. I think Dan Brickley from Google, who runs schema.org <http://schema.org/> was trying to stress that GAI isn’t the change; rather NLP is. We need to understand what’s going on and work with it.
>  
> Tzviya Siegman
> Information Standards Principal
> Wiley
> 201-748-6884
> tsiegman@wiley.com <mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>