Re: preparing Next stakeholder survey, charter and general admin

Yes I would think that it adds value as it increases visibility and
allows people to connect, same would apply to reference on g+ .

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marco
> hadnt thought about a linked in group, because havent thought about how it
> can add value to the community (not many posts here, would people post
> there?)
> - members can add affiliation to their portfolios  without the linnked in
> group, no?
>
> but if useful we can quickly launch one, and if its not used
> we can always delete it later.
>
> I ll do it when I have a mo, if nobody has done it by then
> cheers
> P
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> did you already create a "W3C Semantic Web Interfaces Community" LinkedIn
>> group?
>>
>> it would help raise visibility and allows members to add this
>> affiliation to their portfolio.
>>
>> Marco
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > 41 members, mostly quiet, but active in the background
>> > (doing things without much discussion)
>> >
>> > not bad, but what can we create together?
>> >
>> > I was trying to make the stakeholder survey mandatory for everyone who
>> > joins, but
>> > we do not have a way to implement this yet, so please kindly take a
>> > minute
>> > to give
>> > input when joining, or whenever you have a minute
>> >
>> > Here is the (old) form where members can  still give input
>> >
>> > Input your preferences on the online form
>> >
>> >
>> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0
>> >
>> >
>> > responses
>> >
>> >
>> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0
>> >
>> > NEXT SURVEY
>> > - we could drill a bit more into the group to find out things like
>> >
>> > geographical location of members (to support the planning of
>> > face to face activities) and field of practice (academia, industry etc)
>> >
>> > what else should be useful to know about the group's members?
>> > please suggest any questions you may have under this thread, so that
>> > they
>> > can be included in the survey-
>> >
>> > Also,  please help to shape a charter. Should we aim to have a nice
>> > workable
>> > collectively shaped charter
>> > before the end of the year?
>> >
>> > At the moment we have a stub
>> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/wiki/Main_Page
>> >
>> >
>> > someone suggested the charter should contain the following headings
>> >
>> > 1. community goals
>> > 2. proposed activities/timeframes
>> > 3. governance/rules
>> >
>> > anything else?
>> >
>> > will send another link to 2014 survey with additional
>> > questions/soliciting
>> > inputs for the charter soon
>> >
>> > please start thinking
>> >
>> > cheerios
>> >
>> > PDM
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Marco Neumann
>> KONA
>
>



-- 


---
Marco Neumann
KONA

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2014 14:36:46 UTC