Re: preparing Next stakeholder survey, charter and general admin

Marco

two quicks

- members are encouraged to co- lead by taking initiative
if you think something is beneficial, please do it  :-)
(I have limited capacity, will consider your suggestion when I have a
mo)
-  increasing exposure is good, but, how to increase the activity/exchanges
withing
the group? do you think a linkedin group and g+ will make us more
productive/collaborative?

I ll work on the next round of inputs from members soon, hoping that people
will commit
to at least something :-)

I take the opportunity to thank again Roberto, Martin, Heiko and other for
taking the lead on respective actions, and hope others will follow

cheers

PDM



On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yes I would think that it adds value as it increases visibility and
> allows people to connect, same would apply to reference on g+ .
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Marco
> > hadnt thought about a linked in group, because havent thought about how
> it
> > can add value to the community (not many posts here, would people post
> > there?)
> > - members can add affiliation to their portfolios  without the linnked in
> > group, no?
> >
> > but if useful we can quickly launch one, and if its not used
> > we can always delete it later.
> >
> > I ll do it when I have a mo, if nobody has done it by then
> > cheers
> > P
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> did you already create a "W3C Semantic Web Interfaces Community"
> LinkedIn
> >> group?
> >>
> >> it would help raise visibility and allows members to add this
> >> affiliation to their portfolio.
> >>
> >> Marco
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > 41 members, mostly quiet, but active in the background
> >> > (doing things without much discussion)
> >> >
> >> > not bad, but what can we create together?
> >> >
> >> > I was trying to make the stakeholder survey mandatory for everyone who
> >> > joins, but
> >> > we do not have a way to implement this yet, so please kindly take a
> >> > minute
> >> > to give
> >> > input when joining, or whenever you have a minute
> >> >
> >> > Here is the (old) form where members can  still give input
> >> >
> >> > Input your preferences on the online form
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > responses
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0
> >> >
> >> > NEXT SURVEY
> >> > - we could drill a bit more into the group to find out things like
> >> >
> >> > geographical location of members (to support the planning of
> >> > face to face activities) and field of practice (academia, industry
> etc)
> >> >
> >> > what else should be useful to know about the group's members?
> >> > please suggest any questions you may have under this thread, so that
> >> > they
> >> > can be included in the survey-
> >> >
> >> > Also,  please help to shape a charter. Should we aim to have a nice
> >> > workable
> >> > collectively shaped charter
> >> > before the end of the year?
> >> >
> >> > At the moment we have a stub
> >> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/wiki/Main_Page
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > someone suggested the charter should contain the following headings
> >> >
> >> > 1. community goals
> >> > 2. proposed activities/timeframes
> >> > 3. governance/rules
> >> >
> >> > anything else?
> >> >
> >> > will send another link to 2014 survey with additional
> >> > questions/soliciting
> >> > inputs for the charter soon
> >> >
> >> > please start thinking
> >> >
> >> > cheerios
> >> >
> >> > PDM
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Marco Neumann
> >> KONA
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
>