Re: preparing Next stakeholder survey, charter and general admin

Marco
hadnt thought about a linked in group, because havent thought about how it
can add value to the community (not many posts here, would people post
there?)
- members can add affiliation to their portfolios  without the linnked in
group, no?

but if useful we can quickly launch one, and if its not used
we can always delete it later.

I ll do it when I have a mo, if nobody has done it by then
cheers
P


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marco Neumann <marco.neumann@gmail.com>
wrote:

> did you already create a "W3C Semantic Web Interfaces Community" LinkedIn
> group?
>
> it would help raise visibility and allows members to add this
> affiliation to their portfolio.
>
> Marco
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 41 members, mostly quiet, but active in the background
> > (doing things without much discussion)
> >
> > not bad, but what can we create together?
> >
> > I was trying to make the stakeholder survey mandatory for everyone who
> > joins, but
> > we do not have a way to implement this yet, so please kindly take a
> minute
> > to give
> > input when joining, or whenever you have a minute
> >
> > Here is the (old) form where members can  still give input
> >
> > Input your preferences on the online form
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc6MQ#gid=0
> >
> >
> > responses
> >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0ApXeDqbLLqHSdDRZYXRvcUlEVjlIRjJHcTBpV3poeWc&rm=full#gid=0
> >
> > NEXT SURVEY
> > - we could drill a bit more into the group to find out things like
> >
> > geographical location of members (to support the planning of
> > face to face activities) and field of practice (academia, industry etc)
> >
> > what else should be useful to know about the group's members?
> > please suggest any questions you may have under this thread, so that they
> > can be included in the survey-
> >
> > Also,  please help to shape a charter. Should we aim to have a nice
> workable
> > collectively shaped charter
> > before the end of the year?
> >
> > At the moment we have a stub
> > http://www.w3.org/community/swisig/wiki/Main_Page
> >
> >
> > someone suggested the charter should contain the following headings
> >
> > 1. community goals
> > 2. proposed activities/timeframes
> > 3. governance/rules
> >
> > anything else?
> >
> > will send another link to 2014 survey with additional
> questions/soliciting
> > inputs for the charter soon
> >
> > please start thinking
> >
> > cheerios
> >
> > PDM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
> KONA
>