yr input to swisig /last call

Greets all!!

Thanks a lot for filling out the survey, we now have just over 15 replies
out of 35 members.  Summary and action points to be circulated shortly,(
and to be discussed at the next workshop, if there is time).

As per our community charter,  input is required to qualify for membership
(what's the point of being in a community otherwise?)

Link here
*http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg <http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg>*

Thanks

PDM




On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks a lot to the 10 people who have responded to the stakeholder survey
> so far.
>
> Can others PLEASE fill out the survey? Now??
> *http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg <http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg>*
>
> *Thank you :-)*
>
> I tried to hide the columns with names and emails so that I could publish
> the analytics  to a url, except for those two columns, but due to some
> limitations of (the free version?) of
> google spreadsheets this does not seem possible. even if I hide the
> columns in the s/s, the analytics shows their content  (#google
> #featurerequest)
>
> So I duped the ss and deleted the columns altogether, but due to some
> other limination, the analytics view of the ss is completely empty (#google
> #bug?)
>
> so here the duped ss w/o person data in its original tabular form
> *http://tinyurl.com/qfww2kd <http://tinyurl.com/qfww2kd>*
>
> Had a quick scan, and there are some interesting points for
> discussion/beginning action
>
> In relation to how to deal with lurkers, we may up recommending that all
> W3C communities allow open membership to all, provided a minimum
> contribution commitment is made. This is to ensure honesty of the members
> If someone wants to be an observer is OK, provided they share their
> observations with the rest of the group using a publicly accessible  URL  I
> certainly would not consider silent observers of any value to the commnity,
> unless someone can explain to me what is the point and purpose of such a
> role. Discuss?
>