- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:01:34 +0100
- To: "public-swisig@w3.org" <public-swisig@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=Spp1+=k3hDDuiPLqqF7PmC8My-o4n97r-ta_N9c7EkN3A@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks a lot to the 10 people who have responded to the stakeholder survey so far. Can others PLEASE fill out the survey? Now?? *http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg <http://tinyurl.com/npurmtg>* *Thank you :-)* I tried to hide the columns with names and emails so that I could publish the analytics to a url, except for those two columns, but due to some limitations of (the free version?) of google spreadsheets this does not seem possible. even if I hide the columns in the s/s, the analytics shows their content (#google #featurerequest) So I duped the ss and deleted the columns altogether, but due to some other limination, the analytics view of the ss is completely empty (#google #bug?) so here the duped ss w/o person data in its original tabular form *http://tinyurl.com/qfww2kd <http://tinyurl.com/qfww2kd>* Had a quick scan, and there are some interesting points for discussion/beginning action In relation to how to deal with lurkers, we may up recommending that all W3C communities allow open membership to all, provided a minimum contribution commitment is made. This is to ensure honesty of the members If someone wants to be an observer is OK, provided they share their observations with the rest of the group using a publicly accessible URL I certainly would not consider silent observers of any value to the commnity, unless someone can explain to me what is the point and purpose of such a role. Discuss?
Received on Tuesday, 18 February 2014 12:02:06 UTC