RE: SWEO promotion material

Would it be a good idea to have a presence from all or some of the 4
projects (participants) that this group chose to help demonstrate the SW?

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sweo-ig-request@w3.org]
On
> Behalf Of Dunja Ewinger
> Sent: 15 March 2007 12:27
> To: Ivan Herman
> Cc: Susie Stephens; W3C SWEO IG
> Subject: Re: SWEO promotion material
> 
> 
> No, I don't see any problems with that...
> 
> Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Susie, Dunja,
> >
> >let me reiterate that the text should be sent to the Comm team, too,
> >before finalizing it.
> >
> >B.t.w.: Dunja, is there any problem (legal or otherwise) if these flyers
> >are taken up by W3C (SWEO, the comm team, etc) as general SW Flyers, and
> >not only for the purpose of this specific conference?
> >
> >Ivan
> >
> >Susie Stephens wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Dunja,
> >>
> >>I think your plans sounds excellent. I look forward to hearing what you
> >>think about possibly simplifying the layout for the overview.
> >>
> >>Lets discuss during next week's call which use cases/case
> >>studies/community projects we'd like to include in the conference pack.
> >>
> >>Ivan will need to respond to your question about money.
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>Susie
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On 3/14/07, *Dunja Ewinger* <de@webxcerpt.com <mailto:de@webxcerpt.com>>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>    Hi Susie,
> >>
> >>    to see what format I was talking about please find attached the
Semantic
> >>    Web Days Flyer (Flyer_swd.pdf).
> >>
> >>    My idea is to create a generell Semantic Web flyer in this format.
It
> >>    would consist of the (current version of the) SWEO Logo, maybe the
W3C
> >>    Logo would be good as well, a slogan (that would probably needs to
be
> >>    discussed...), maybe the layer cake, a nice "eye catcher"
(e.g.image),
> >>    and generell information on SW (introduction, categories,
application
> >>    areas, FAQ...)
> >>
> >>    I will put together the material and give it to the designer, so she
> >>    can
> >>    start. A very first draft (pdf) will be then sent around by latest
> >>    Thursday next week, maybe on time for the telcon on Wednesday.
> >>    Within the 3 weeks I'm in holiday the SWEO group should discuss the
> >>    flyer in terms of:
> >>
> >>    the slogan
> >>    the logo
> >>    Is the information in the correct order?
> >>    What should be the core messages?
> >>    Is something missing?
> >>    Is the text correct?
> >>    etc.
> >>
> >>    So by the time I return the designer can continue to work on the
flyer
> >>    with all the input from SWEO. In this way it should be not a problem
to
> >>    have the flyer ready for the ESTC.
> >>
> >>    I agree with the idea to present use cases or case studies. But of
> >>    course one would need to select a few from the current list. How do
we
> >>    decide which use case we should take?
> >>
> >>    One idea that came up during the telcon was to describe the common
> >>    projects. It would be good to make a generell decision: shall we
present
> >>    "solutions" or shall we describe most promising projects but without
> >>    solutions yet?
> >>
> >>    Another question is how we should present either the use cases or
the
> >>    projects. In full text or in a table? I found an example for the
table
> >>    format that could be feasible:
> >>
> >>    W3C SWAD
> >>
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-
> applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example
> >>
<http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-
> applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example>
> >>
> >>
> >>    I asked the designer to think about possible presentation formats
for
> >>    the use cases (series of papers, a booklet...). Maybe we can discuss
> >>    that during the next telcon.
> >>
> >>    Regarding the finances: is there any money in W3C/SWEO that could be
> >>    spent on the promotion material? REWERSE could of course pay a part
of
> >>    the costs but since we are an EU project we have limited financial
> >>    resources... An idea could be that REWERSE pays the cost for the
design
> >>    and W3C for the print.
> >>
> >>    What do you think?
> >>
> >>    Kind regards,
> >>    Dunja
> >>
> >>    --
> >>    Dunja Ewinger
> >>    Technology Transfer & Awareness
> >>    EU-network of Excellence REWERSE
> >>    http://rewerse.net <http://rewerse.net>
> >>    Tel.: +49 89 548 088 48
> >>    Email: de@webXcerpt.com <mailto:de@webXcerpt.com>
> >>    REWERSE is member of the W3C SWEO Interest Group
> >>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >- --
> >
> >Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> >URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> >PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
> >FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
> >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> >iD8DBQFF+RlHdR3hQzQ/Gj0RAj9gAKC8tLEeiYZkX+GxIVpb72sI1HOtAwCfXZmJ
> >sltuys8JpaWwSqbB23RlW9U=
> >=cJSx
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Dunja Ewinger
> Technology Transfer & Awareness
> EU-network of Excellence REWERSE
> http://rewerse.net
> Tel.: +49 89 548 088 48
> Email: de@webXcerpt.com
> REWERSE is member of the W3C SWEO Interest Group
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 11:14:12 UTC