Re: SWEO promotion material

No, I don't see any problems with that...

Ivan Herman wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Susie, Dunja,
>
>let me reiterate that the text should be sent to the Comm team, too,
>before finalizing it.
>
>B.t.w.: Dunja, is there any problem (legal or otherwise) if these flyers
>are taken up by W3C (SWEO, the comm team, etc) as general SW Flyers, and
>not only for the purpose of this specific conference?
>
>Ivan
>
>Susie Stephens wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi Dunja,
>> 
>>I think your plans sounds excellent. I look forward to hearing what you
>>think about possibly simplifying the layout for the overview.
>> 
>>Lets discuss during next week's call which use cases/case
>>studies/community projects we'd like to include in the conference pack.
>> 
>>Ivan will need to respond to your question about money.
>> 
>>Cheers,
>> 
>>Susie
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>>On 3/14/07, *Dunja Ewinger* <de@webxcerpt.com <mailto:de@webxcerpt.com>>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>    Hi Susie,
>>
>>    to see what format I was talking about please find attached the Semantic
>>    Web Days Flyer (Flyer_swd.pdf).
>>
>>    My idea is to create a generell Semantic Web flyer in this format. It
>>    would consist of the (current version of the) SWEO Logo, maybe the W3C
>>    Logo would be good as well, a slogan (that would probably needs to be
>>    discussed...), maybe the layer cake, a nice "eye catcher" (e.g.image),
>>    and generell information on SW (introduction, categories, application
>>    areas, FAQ...)
>>
>>    I will put together the material and give it to the designer, so she
>>    can
>>    start. A very first draft (pdf) will be then sent around by latest
>>    Thursday next week, maybe on time for the telcon on Wednesday.
>>    Within the 3 weeks I'm in holiday the SWEO group should discuss the
>>    flyer in terms of:
>>
>>    the slogan
>>    the logo
>>    Is the information in the correct order?
>>    What should be the core messages?
>>    Is something missing?
>>    Is the text correct?
>>    etc.
>>
>>    So by the time I return the designer can continue to work on the flyer
>>    with all the input from SWEO. In this way it should be not a problem to
>>    have the flyer ready for the ESTC.
>>
>>    I agree with the idea to present use cases or case studies. But of
>>    course one would need to select a few from the current list. How do we
>>    decide which use case we should take?
>>
>>    One idea that came up during the telcon was to describe the common
>>    projects. It would be good to make a generell decision: shall we present
>>    "solutions" or shall we describe most promising projects but without
>>    solutions yet?
>>
>>    Another question is how we should present either the use cases or the
>>    projects. In full text or in a table? I found an example for the table
>>    format that could be feasible:
>>
>>    W3C SWAD
>>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example
>>    <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/reports/chosen_demos_rationale_report/hp-applications-survey.html#Database%20integration%20example>
>>
>>
>>    I asked the designer to think about possible presentation formats for
>>    the use cases (series of papers, a booklet...). Maybe we can discuss
>>    that during the next telcon.
>>
>>    Regarding the finances: is there any money in W3C/SWEO that could be
>>    spent on the promotion material? REWERSE could of course pay a part of
>>    the costs but since we are an EU project we have limited financial
>>    resources... An idea could be that REWERSE pays the cost for the design
>>    and W3C for the print.
>>
>>    What do you think?
>>
>>    Kind regards,
>>    Dunja
>>
>>    --
>>    Dunja Ewinger
>>    Technology Transfer & Awareness
>>    EU-network of Excellence REWERSE
>>    http://rewerse.net <http://rewerse.net>
>>    Tel.: +49 89 548 088 48
>>    Email: de@webXcerpt.com <mailto:de@webXcerpt.com>
>>    REWERSE is member of the W3C SWEO Interest Group
>>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/ <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>- --
>
>Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
>FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iD8DBQFF+RlHdR3hQzQ/Gj0RAj9gAKC8tLEeiYZkX+GxIVpb72sI1HOtAwCfXZmJ
>sltuys8JpaWwSqbB23RlW9U=
>=cJSx
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Dunja Ewinger
Technology Transfer & Awareness
EU-network of Excellence REWERSE
http://rewerse.net 
Tel.: +49 89 548 088 48 
Email: de@webXcerpt.com
REWERSE is member of the W3C SWEO Interest Group
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/

Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 12:26:41 UTC