- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:26:37 +0200
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:02:25PM -0400, Ralph Swick wrote: > SemWeb Deployment Working Group > > 19 May 2009 So that we do not lose track of it... - Ralph was going to check with the Head of Communications whether the pointers back to the last good versions of legacy SKOS Core specifications could be called "last" versions instead of "latest" [1]. Tom [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0021.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009May/0022.html > > -- From SKOS Core Guide (2005) to "SKOS Primer (2008)" > > http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/ > > This page points to two documents: > > -- SKOS Primer ("Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer") > -- SKOS Core Guide ("Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102") > > Clicking on [1] takes one to a document the headers of which say > that the "latest version" is at [2]. This is potentially > confusing. The redirection page for SKOS Core Vocabulary > Specification [3] has the same problem. > > We cannot alter the header line of the "latest version" URI an > already published document, so maybe the URI of the version last > published [1] should be called something different, such as > "version last published". Suggestions for a better label > welcome... > > Tom > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102 > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-guide/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-skos-core-spec/ -- Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 07:27:37 UTC