W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: [Recipes] new editor's draft

From: Jon Phipps <jphipps@madcreek.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:10:27 -0400
Message-Id: <4FE25458-7625-46F4-A87A-2406348C6EDA@madcreek.com>
Cc: "SWD Working SWD" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
To: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>

On May 28, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Ed Summers wrote:

> Nice work Jon ...

You are too kind. Seriously.

> it looks like (unless I'm goofing something on this
> end) that there are still a few remaining problems:
> Recipe 4.
> curl http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example4/
> redirects to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/ 
> examples-20080421/example4-content/2005-10-31.html
> which says Example 3 in the HTML rather than Example 4.
> likewise curl --header "Accept: application/rdf+xml"
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example4/
> redirects to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/ 
> examples-20080421/example4-content/2005-10-31.rdf
> which has URIs containing example3 instead of example4.

Fixed! <sigh>

> Recipe 5.
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example5- 
> content/2005-10-31-docs/index.html
> lacks ID attributes for ClassA, ClassB, propA and propB.

I don't think that there should _necessarily_ be ID attributes for  
the classes and properties in the index.html file, which functions  
simply as an "overview document". The .htaccess should redirect any  
html request for those resources to individual files, since recipe 5  
is for a slash namespace and an html request for the vocabulary URI  
would be the only request that would return the index.html file,  
which contains direct links to the appropriate class/property files.

The rdf example was more than a bit messed up for example 5 too, but  
that should be all better now.

Thanks for the continued careful checking,

Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 19:11:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:51 UTC