- From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 14:03:35 -0400
- To: "SWD Working SWD" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Nice work Jon ... it looks like (unless I'm goofing something on this end) that there are still a few remaining problems: Recipe 4. curl http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example4/ redirects to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example4-content/2005-10-31.html which says Example 3 in the HTML rather than Example 4. likewise curl --header "Accept: application/rdf+xml" http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example4/ redirects to http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example4-content/2005-10-31.rdf which has URIs containing example3 instead of example4. Recipe 5. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples-20080421/example5-content/2005-10-31-docs/index.html lacks ID attributes for ClassA, ClassB, propA and propB. All this pointing and clicking and looking makes me think it would be nice to have a vocabulary validator, that can somehow do some of this checking. But perhaps it would have to be driven by instance data. > An excellent point, but I think we already decided that providing recipes > for RDFa and GRDDL was out of scope (for this version of the document at > least) and inserted the following to cover that particular portion of our > posterior: > > "Finally, it should be noted that the Recipes described in this Cookbook are > not the only way to publish a vocabulary or ontology for use by Semantic Web > applications. RDFa and its cousin GRDDL may in the near future provide an > effective method for publishing documents for use by both people and > machines. But a useful discussion of RDFa and GRDDL is well beyond the scope > of this document." Perfect, sorry I missed that initially. It would be fun to write it up as a Note sometime. //Ed
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 18:04:17 UTC