- From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:58:56 +0100
- To: "Thomas Baker" <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Cc: "SWD Working Group" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear WG, Regrets also for me, I'm travelling. Cheers, Simone On Feb 18, 2008 5:38 PM, Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: > > Agenda - Feb 19 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC > W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/ > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/ > Tuesday, 1600 UTC / 0800 Seattle / 1100 Boston / > 1600 London / 1700 Amsterdam > Phone > Boston: +1-617-761-6200 > Nice: +33-4-8906-3499 > Bristol: +44-117-370-6152 > Conference code 79394# ('SWDWG') > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/swd (member-only) > > Chair: Tom > Scribe: Alistair (on deck Ed) > Regrets: Jon, Michael, Daniel > > Attendance of SWD WG telecons is restricted to > registered WG participants and persons invited > by the chairs. > > ====================================================================== > > 1. ADMIN (10 min) > --------------------------------------- > > PROPOSED to accept minutes of the Feb 12 telecon: > > http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html > > Next telecon: 26 February 2008 1600 UTC > > Upcoming telecons and scribes - > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ScribeDuty > > Face-to-face meeting, day and a half, in Amsterdam? > Potential dates: 4-7th May 2008 > > ACTION: Chairs to put schedule review on agenda [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action24] > > ====================================================================== > 2. RDFa - see RDFa Overview document > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/ > > -- RDFa Task Force telecons > Teleconferences on Thursdays, 1600 UTC - open to "everyone interested in RDFa" > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/rdfa, conference code 7332# ('RDFa'). > > 2008-02-14 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/02/14-rdfa-minutes.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > RDFa Syntax Last Call > > ACTION: Ralph to let the Task Force know that SWD requires extended response on editor's draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action04] > > ACTION: Ralph to ask task force to recommend appropriate time frame [for Last Call review] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action16] > > ACTION: Ben to prepare the email to request the decision for publishing on Feb 12th [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action24] > > Request to process RDFa Syntax Document Draft as Last Call > 2008-02-17. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0064.html - email from Shane > > The RDFa TF has: > > 1. Made all major and minor edits to the document that were needed. > 2. Implemented changes to address Ed and Diego's reviews. > 3. Set the end of the Last Call commenting period as April 4th, 2008. > 4. Agreed that the link below is the draft that should go to last call. > > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080217/Overview.html > > The document previous to this one was reviewed and accepted [1] by the > XHTML2 workgroup on February 6th, 2008. The differences between that > version and the current draft can be found here: > > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080217/rdfa-syntax-diff.html > > RDFa Syntax - decide on Last Call WD > -- Response to reviews > 2008-02-17 update. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0065.html > -- Ed's review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0014.html > -- 2008-02-17. Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0075.html > -- 2008-02-17. Ed replies: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0076.html > -- Diego's review: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0197.html > -- 2008-02-17. Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0074.html > -- 2008-02-17. Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Feb/0078.html > As of 2008-02-17, Diego still considering. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Other RDFa actions: > > ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa (with assistance from Michael) [recorded in [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] > > ====================================================================== > 3. SKOS - see > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOS > > ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties (updating RDF schema) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action06] > > -- SKOS Primer (Antoine, Ed) - http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOSPrimer (table needs updating!!) > > ACTION: Ralph to publish Feb 12th version of SKOS primer as working draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action05] > > -- SKOS Reference (Alistair, Sean) > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080125/ > > -- Deprecated properties, RDF schemas > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0004.html > > ACTION: Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 (Concept Coordination) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action09] > > ACTION: Alistair to propose an approach to clarify which aspects of the extension module should be in scope for the candidate recommendation package. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action09] > > ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/18-swd-minutes.html#action10] > > ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > "Open" SKOS Issues http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues > > ACTION: Alistair and Antoine to propose priorities on how to resolve issues 48 through 84 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action12] > > -- Overview of priorities > 2008-02-17. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0060.html - "top ten" issues are: > 1. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 - ConceptSemantics (Antoine) > 2. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/67 - StatingFormalDefinitions (Alistair) > 3. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/48 - IndexingRelationship (Antoine) > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/77 - SubjectIndexing (Alistair) > 4. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/79 - Notations (Alistair) > 5. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/74 - MappingPropertyConventions (Alistair) > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/71 - ParallelMappingVocabulary (Alistair) > 6. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/64 - TextualDescriptionsForConcepts (Alistair, 2007-11-20) > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/65 - XMLLiteralNotes (Alistair, 2007-11-20) > 7. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/68 - RelatedIrreflexive (Alistair) > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/69 - BroaderIrreflexive (Alistair) > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/70 - BroaderCycles (Alistair) > 8. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/80 - SKOS-OWL-Patterns (Alistair) > 9. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/37 - SkosSpecialization (Alistair) > 10. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/41 - UseLangTagsInExamples > > -- See Priority #1 above: > Issue-54: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/54 - ConceptSemantics (Antoine) > > ACTION: Antoine to propose a resolution for ISSUE 54 by next telecon [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action11] > --done > > 2008-02-12. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0053.html Antoine proposes: > > "RESOLUTION: Section 3 of the SKOS reference is adopted as a partial > solution to ISSUE-54. ISSUE-54 is CLOSEd. ISSUE-80 is now OPENed" > > -- See Priority #5 above: > Issue-74: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/74 - MappingPropertyConventions (Alistair) > Issue-71: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/71 - ParallelMappingVocabulary (Alistair) > 2008-02-17. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0061.html - Alistair discussion > 2008-02-17. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0062.html - Antoine discussion > > -- Issue-47: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/47 - MappingProvenanceInformation (Guus) > 2008-02-05. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0017.html - Antoine discussions > 2008-02-17. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0063.html - Antoine proposed solution > > -- SKOS implementations > > ====================================================================== > 4. RECIPES - > > New WD published: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20080123/ > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Vocab/principles-20080204 > > ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] > > ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] > > ====================================================================== > 5. VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT - see > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#VocabularyMgt > > 2008-02-05. New Editor's draft posted at: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/Vocab/principles-20080204 > > ACTION: Vit and Elisa to include in the document all the target sections plus an allocation of sections to people and potentially a standard structure for sections [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/08-swd-minutes.html#action07] > > > -- > Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de > > -- Simone Onofri http://www.siatec.net/
Received on Monday, 18 February 2008 22:59:04 UTC