W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2008

[SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair]

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:15:23 +0100
Message-ID: <47B8B1FB.1030902@few.vu.nl>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Dear all,

[Alistair seems to have some mail problems, so I will shamelessly 
forward some pieces he has sent outside the list, as the action also 
involves me and it is important to have the information sent before the 
telecon]

Regarding the action:

> [NEW] ACTION: Alistair and Antoine to propose priorities on how to
> resolve ISSUE 56 to ISSUE 84 [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action12]

Alistair has made the following proposal;

> == Top 10 Issues ==
> 
> Top 10 at a glance:
> 
>  1. [ISSUE-54] ConceptSemantics
>  2. [ISSUE-67] StatingFormalDefinitions
>  3. [ISSUE-48] IndexingRelationship / [ISSUE-77] SubjectIndexing
>  4. [ISSUE-79] Notations
>  5. [ISSUE-74] MappingPropertyConventions / [ISSUE-71] 
> ParallelMappingVocabulary
>  6. [ISSUE-64] TextualDescriptionsForConcepts / [ISSUE-65] XMLLiteralNotes
>  7. [ISSUE-68] RelatedIrreflexive / [ISSUE-69] BroaderIrreflexive / 
> [ISSUE-70] BroaderCycles
>  8. [ISSUE-80] SKOS-OWL-Patterns
>  9. [ISSUE-37] SkosSpecialization
>  10. [ISSUE-41] UseLangTagsInExamples


I agree with these, because they can have important consequences on the 
SKOS vocabulary itself, as opposed to many issues of the list in [1] 
that regard the semantics of the vocabulary elements *once they have 
been chosen*.

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0041.html
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2008 22:22:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:52 UTC