- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 23:15:23 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, [Alistair seems to have some mail problems, so I will shamelessly forward some pieces he has sent outside the list, as the action also involves me and it is important to have the information sent before the telecon] Regarding the action: > [NEW] ACTION: Alistair and Antoine to propose priorities on how to > resolve ISSUE 56 to ISSUE 84 [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-swd-minutes.html#action12] Alistair has made the following proposal; > == Top 10 Issues == > > Top 10 at a glance: > > 1. [ISSUE-54] ConceptSemantics > 2. [ISSUE-67] StatingFormalDefinitions > 3. [ISSUE-48] IndexingRelationship / [ISSUE-77] SubjectIndexing > 4. [ISSUE-79] Notations > 5. [ISSUE-74] MappingPropertyConventions / [ISSUE-71] > ParallelMappingVocabulary > 6. [ISSUE-64] TextualDescriptionsForConcepts / [ISSUE-65] XMLLiteralNotes > 7. [ISSUE-68] RelatedIrreflexive / [ISSUE-69] BroaderIrreflexive / > [ISSUE-70] BroaderCycles > 8. [ISSUE-80] SKOS-OWL-Patterns > 9. [ISSUE-37] SkosSpecialization > 10. [ISSUE-41] UseLangTagsInExamples I agree with these, because they can have important consequences on the SKOS vocabulary itself, as opposed to many issues of the list in [1] that regard the semantics of the vocabulary elements *once they have been chosen*. Cheers, Antoine [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0041.html
Received on Sunday, 17 February 2008 22:22:45 UTC