RE: [SKOS] SKOS Primer's status - proposal to move it forward

pant pant... I am more or less half way. Here my comments for now:
 
Comments to the SKOS Primer v.11/02/2008 (SKOSPrimer-080211.html)
- Section 1.1 About this Primer: in this sections and other I still see the
use of N3 notion. I think this will be changed to Turtle syntax, right?
- Section: 2.2.4 Use of Labels Outside of SKOS: here we say "These labels are
compatible because foaf:name is a sub-property of rdfs:label." Why there is
the need to say this sentence? why not then considering also "foaf:nick" used
in the example?
- 2.3 Semantic Relationships: the name of the semantic relationships is not
changes yet in this version. Will then be changed after only if we approve
the corresponding issue?
- 2.3.2 Associative Relationships: I know we already discussed it ... but
seems strange that "skos:related is not defined as a generally transitive
property"... are we sure about it? if so, can we provide an example as done
for the other case (transitivity of BT wheels - vehicles).
 
will continue and join the conference in 15 minutes.
 
bye

 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] 
 Sent: Mon 11/02/2008 12:58 
 To: SWD WG; Sini, Margherita (KCEW); Quentin Reul 
 Cc: 
 Subject: Re: [SKOS] SKOS Primer's status - proposal to move it
forward
 
 

 Dear all,
 
 As we discussed last week, none of the 4 issues mentioned in the mail
 below should be considered as blocking for the Primer, cf [1]:
 
 >    Antoine: over past week, we tried to address comments from
people
 > [...see http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-swd-minutes.html for
discussion...]
 >
 >    guus: with this input, don't let this block publication of the
 >    working draft
 
 Further, the document has been checked by Ed wrt. conformance of
examples
 wrt Turtle language.
 
 I would therefore propose to move forward the Primer, and to publish
the
 February 11 Editor's draft of the Primer as a working draft [2].
 This of course requires explicit endorsement of the two reviewers who
 kindly accepted to comment on the previous version.
 Margherita and Quentin, will you be at the next teleconference? Do
you
 support this publication?
 
 Best, regards,
 
 Antoine
 
 [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-swd-minutes.html
 [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer
 
 
 >
 > Dear all,
 >
 > As a preparation for tomorrow's telecon, here is an update
regarding
 > the Primer's status.
 >
 > There is a last version (Feb 5) available at
 > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer
 >
 > This answers comments from Quentin [1] and Margherita [2], as well
as
 > their follow-ups [3,4]. Track of our answers are [5,6,7,8,9]
 > This version also takes into account a remark by Sean [10],
answered
 > in [11].
 > Finally, the new version tries to take into account the input Guus
 > sent on links between OWL classes and SKOS concepts [12]
 >
 > The points that I feel now could prevent us from releasing the
Primer
 > very soon are:
 > 1. there could be content issues, as I've noticed in [13], for OWL
 > classes and SKOS concepts.
 > 2. there are still a number of TODOs related to our finding
solutions
 > on open and raised ISSUEs.
 > 3. there is a pending request for homogeneizing the examples, that
is,
 > picking them from a same topic and concept scheme.
 > 4. there is a pending request on representing examples with
figures,
 > and not N3 code snippets.
 >
 > I feel only 3 and 4 are important for a decision to release the
 > Primer, as 1 and 2 could be out of reach (the Reference faces the
same
 > ISSUEs, after all).
 > Ed and I are working on these 3 and 4, but this is clearly
something
 > that will require some time. I would welcome advice from the WG on
this.
 >
 > Best,
 >
 > Antoine and Ed
 >
 > [1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0078.html
 > [2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html
 > [3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0175.html
 > [4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0003.html
 > [5]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0173.html
 > [6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0183.html
 > [7]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0217.html
 > [8]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0171.html
 > [9]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0008.html
 > [10]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0207.html
 > [11]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0216.html
 > [12]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0198.html
 > [13]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0009.html
 >
 >

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 15:47:15 UTC