- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:48:38 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, As a preparation for tomorrow's telecon, here is an update regarding the Primer's status. > > > -- SKOS Primer (Antoine, Ed) > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Primer > > RIF comments: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html > > ACTION: Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on > relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users > [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action06] > DONE: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0198.html There is a last version (Feb 5) available at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer This answers comments from Quentin [1] and Margherita [2], as well as their follow-ups [3,4]. Track of our answers are [5,6,7,8,9] This version also takes into account a remark by Sean [10], answered in [11]. Finally, the new version tries to take into account the input Guus sent on links between OWL classes and SKOS concepts [12] The points that I feel now could prevent us from releasing the Primer very soon are: 1. there could be content issues, as I've noticed in [13], for OWL classes and SKOS concepts. 2. there are still a number of TODOs related to our finding solutions on open and raised ISSUEs. 3. there is a pending request for homogeneizing the examples, that is, picking them from a same topic and concept scheme. 4. there is a pending request on representing examples with figures, and not N3 code snippets. I feel only 3 and 4 are important for a decision to release the Primer, as 1 and 2 could be out of reach (the Reference faces the same ISSUEs, after all). Ed and I are working on these 3 and 4, but this is clearly something that will require some time. I would welcome advice from the WG on this. Best, Antoine and Ed [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0078.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0175.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0003.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0173.html [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0183.html [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0217.html [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0171.html [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0008.html [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0207.html [11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0216.html [12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0198.html [13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0009.html
Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 22:48:48 UTC