W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > February 2008

[SKOS] Primer's status (was Re: [ALL] agenda 5 Feb telecon - 1600 UTC)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:48:38 +0100
Message-ID: <47A79646.1070409@few.vu.nl>
To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>

Dear all,

As a preparation for tomorrow's telecon, here is an update regarding the 
Primer's status.

>
>
> -- SKOS Primer (Antoine, Ed)
>     http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Primer
>
> RIF comments:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html
>
> ACTION: Alistair and Guus write draft section in primer on 
> relationship between SKOS concepts and OWL classes for OWL DL users 
> [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action06]
> DONE:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0198.html


There is a last version (Feb 5) available at 
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer

This answers comments from Quentin [1] and Margherita [2], as well as 
their follow-ups [3,4]. Track of our answers are [5,6,7,8,9]
This version also takes into account a remark by Sean [10], answered in 
[11].
Finally, the new version tries to take into account the input Guus sent 
on links between OWL classes and SKOS concepts [12]

The points that I feel now could prevent us from releasing the Primer 
very soon are:
1. there could be content issues, as I've noticed in [13], for OWL 
classes and SKOS concepts.
2. there are still a number of TODOs related to our finding solutions on 
open and raised ISSUEs.
3. there is a pending request for homogeneizing the examples, that is, 
picking them from a same topic and concept scheme.
4. there is a pending request on representing examples with figures, and 
not N3 code snippets.

I feel only 3 and 4 are important for a decision to release the Primer, 
as 1 and 2 could be out of reach (the Reference faces the same ISSUEs, 
after all).
Ed and I are working on these 3 and 4, but this is clearly something 
that will require some time. I would welcome advice from the WG on this.

Best,

Antoine and Ed

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0078.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0175.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0003.html
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0173.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0183.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0217.html
[8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0171.html
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0008.html
[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0207.html
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0216.html
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0198.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0009.html
Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 22:48:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:48 UTC