RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 "Minimal Fix" Proposal

Hi all,

I propose the following section of the SKOS Semantics wiki draft as resolution of ISSUE-33 "Grouping Constructs" [1]:

<http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics/Grouping?action=recall&rev=2>

This section implements the "Minimal Fix" proposal [2], with a few additional axiomatic triples to make explicit the OWL typing of properties and the disjointness of skos:Collection and skos:ConceptScheme.

Note that this section does not address the issue of constructing a systematic hierarchical display, but delegates this responsibility to the SKOS Primer. Note also that the SKOS Primer section on grouping constructs is yet to be done, and that in particular I have not met Antoine's concerns below regarding nested collections.

However, I suggest we accept this resolution for now (because it does fix the actual issue), and raise a new issue regarding the representation and construction of systematic hierarchical displays.

ACTION: Alistair to propose minimal fix for resolution of issue 33 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/22-swd-minutes.html#action09]

--done

ACTION: Alistair to propose resolution for Issue-33 (minimal fix) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/12-swd-minutes.html#action12]

--done

Cheers,

Alistair.

[1] <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/33>
[2] <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs/ProposalOne?action=recall&rev=8>

--
Alistair Miles
Research Associate
Science and Technology Facilities Council
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Harwell Science and Innovation Campus
Didcot
Oxfordshire OX11 0QX
United Kingdom
Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Antoine Isaac
> Sent: 22 May 2007 17:32
> To: Miles, AJ (Alistair)
> Cc: SWD WG; public-esw-thes@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-33 "Minimal Fix" Proposal
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I still wonder whether something should be added to [1] to 
> fully convince me. I've looked at the intuitive description 
> of the algorithm that is presented in there to insert nodes 
> in the hierarchy, and it is really unclear about how it 
> should deal with nested node labels. Indeed I'm pretty sure 
> that the current description fails at giving a good strategy 
> for them...
> 
> I would propose that the proposal gives an idea about how to 
> insert node labels in the hierarchy when we have situations 
> as complex as:
> -----
> Styles and Periods
>    <styles and periods by region>
>        <The Islamic World>
>            Saracenic
>            pre-Islamic
>            <Islamic World dynastic styles and periods>
>                 Orthodox Caliphate
>                 Umayyad
>                 Abbasid
> ------
> (taken from [2])
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> [1] 
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstruc
> ts/ProposalOne
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've written up a possible resolution to ISSUE-33: 
> GroupingConstructs on the SWDWG wiki, see:
> >
> > 
> <http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/GroupingConstructs/Prop
> > osalOne?action=recall&rev=8>
> >
> > Note that I am not necessarily endorsing this proposal. 
> This is a proposal which attempts to fix the issue with the 
> minimum amount of change to the current SKOS specifications. 
> There may, however, be good reasons for making more 
> substantial changes, which are hinted at in the discussion. 
> I'll try to write up some alternatives asap.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Alistair.
> >
> > --
> > Alistair Miles
> > Research Associate
> > Science and Technology Facilities Council Rutherford Appleton 
> > Laboratory Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Didcot Oxfordshire 
> > OX11 0QX United Kingdom
> > Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman
> > Email: a.j.miles@rl.ac.uk
> > Tel: +44 (0)1235 445440
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 15 June 2007 13:12:52 UTC