- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:06:11 -0500
- To: John McClure <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <94610F49-5223-4CC6-978B-D5E2C9473660@mit.edu>
John, Yes, we set ourselves up for this one, didn't we! :) I should point that the Primer is careful to say "one should be able to use RDF/A with other XML dialects, e.g. XHTML1, SVG, given proper schema additions." That's a bit of handwaving on our part. We believe that RDF/A will be useful in other contexts, and will be usable via XML Schema Modularization, but we have *not* done the legwork to actually make that happen yet, and we probably don't want to give the impression that RDF/A is immediately ready for use in these other languages. I assume from your comment that, at the very least, we need to make the above points much clearer. -Ben On Jan 31, 2006, at 4:59 PM, John McClure wrote: > The primer states that RDF/A can be used in XML streams other than > XHTML2 (the primer mentions XHTML1 and SVG). I am wondering if a > sample to that effect can be included using, for instance, Dublin > Core elements .... > > <foo:Person rdf:about='someURI'> > <dc:title rdfa:property='FullName'>Jon Doe</dc:title> > <dc:identifier rdfa:property='SSN'>999-99-9999</dc:identifier> > </foo:Person> > > Please note that an rdfa: namespace is presumed necessary, unless > one expects every XML dialect to be as kind as XHTML has been to > hardwire the RDF/A attributes. Also note that the rdf: namespace is > used for the 'about' attribute. > > Thanks > John
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:06:22 UTC