- From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:03:19 -0500
- To: SWBPD list <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi all, I made a mistake in the version of the RDF/A Primer that I presented at the telecon yesterday. I have just finished uploading the right version, which you can find here: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-01-24-rdfa-primer With the WG and specifically the reviewers' approval (DBooth, GaryNg, and also "unofficial" reviewers), I am hoping that we can rapidly agree that this latest version should be the one that becomes our first published WD. The only difference in content is that the new version has an extra section (section #2), and the old sections 2 and 3 are merged into the new section 3 for purely organizational purposes (no text is lost or added in those sections, just reorganized.) The point of the new section 2 is to add an even simpler introductory example. We believe this additional section is in line with the comments we received from reviewers, both official and earlier, unofficial reviews. In fact, we began writing it in part to respond to some of these early comments 2 weeks ago. The already-approved version is still at the old URL for comparison: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2006-01-15-rdfa-primer I want to stress that this is entirely *my* mistake: the TF had agreed [1,2] that this second version would be presented to the WG yesterday, and I simply forgot. Publishing these additional examples now is quite important for getting the word out about RDF/A and making it competitive against other metadata inclusion proposals, outside of W3C, that are gaining traction. Apologies for my mistake. I hope you'll see that these edits do not constitute a substantive change to the document, rather they help make the same points more appealing to and understandable by a larger audience. -Ben Adida ben@mit.edu [1] Discussion during last segment of January 10th TF telecon: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/10-swbp-minutes [2] Discussion, at beginning, of Mark's new examples during January 17th TF telecon: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/17-swbp-minutes
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 17:03:34 UTC