RE: [VM] TAG clarification on 302 vs 303, PURLS and more...

> From: Alistair Miles
> . . .
> Ralph raised the point that simply asking OCLC to change 302 
> to 303 for all responses by the PURL server is not a 
> reasonable solution, because a 302 "Found" response code is 
> actually quite appropriate for the majority of purl.org URIs. 

Yes.  Maybe purl.org could offer registrants the choice when a URI is
registered, to indicate whether they want their URI to forward using 302
or 303.

David Booth

Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 21:00:27 UTC