- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:00:21 -0500
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> From: Alistair Miles > . . . > Ralph raised the point that simply asking OCLC to change 302 > to 303 for all responses by the PURL server is not a > reasonable solution, because a 302 "Found" response code is > actually quite appropriate for the majority of purl.org URIs. Yes. Maybe purl.org could offer registrants the choice when a URI is registered, to indicate whether they want their URI to forward using 302 or 303. David Booth
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 21:00:27 UTC