- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:51:33 +0000
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
1. Note that David Wood suggested moving para starting "The Semantic Web
community has ..." forward so that it is clearer what the note offers.
2. It is unclear whether the abstract is appropriate.
3. The reference [MvH 2004] should be [OWL] or similar.
4. The reference [MM 2004] should be [RDF] or similar.
5. Suggest rephrasing of "Semantic Web languages are far more specific."
6. Suggest replace "In contrast to object-oriented languages" with
"In contrast to many object-oriented languages"
("many" could be "well-known" or "most" or "some" or "several"; I prefer
"many")
7. The para stating "In order to "attach" a property to a class" is not
well-worded, suggest revising for greater clarity and accuracy
8. The use of RDF Individual in Figure 6 is useful but misleading, in
that RDF does not provide such a class. owl:Thing is perhaps the
closest. Perhaps the best thing is simply to leave the figure as is but
add a footnote to the effect that RDF Individual is introduced in this
note for explanatory purposes.
Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 16:52:23 UTC