Re: [VM] Telecon agenda - Tue Oct 15 at 1400 UTC (1500 Amsterdam)

>
> Vocabulary Management telecon, Tue, Nov 15, 1400 UTC (1500 Berlin)
>
> Zakim: +1.617.761.6200
> Conference code 8683# ('VMTF')
> irc://irc.w3.org:6665/vmtf
> http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1678
>

Regrets, sorry am on the road...

Dan


> AGENDA
>
> This telecon will discuss the following best-practice goal:
>
>   A URI for an RDF Property or Class should be dereferencable and
>   should provide both RDF (i.e. content type application/rdf+xml) and
>   [X]HTML representations (e.g. content type text/html or
>   application/xhtml+xml).  The client should be able to choose the
>   representation by using content negotiation.
>
> As outlined in [1], the call will walk through the following
> eight items with the goal of answering the questions associated
> with each:
>
> ITEM 1: Minimum Requirements
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Minimum
>
>     Are the 'minimum requirements' ...
>
>      (a) Correct?
>      (b) Complete?
>
> ITEM 2: Good Practice Requirements
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Good-Pract
>
>     Are the 'good-practice requirements' ...
>
>      (a) Correct?
>      (b) Complete?
>
> ITEM 3: Hash Static Configuration, Minimal
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example1
>
>      (a) Does 'example 1' configuration satisfy 'minimum requirements'?
>      (b) Is 'example 1' configuration optimal?
>      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 1' configuration?
>
> ITEM 4: Hash Static Configuration, Good Practice
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example2
>
>      (a) Does 'example 2' configuration satisfy 'good-practice
> requirements'?
>      (b) Is 'example 2' configuration optimal?
>      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 2' configuration?
>
>     (This configuration is proposed for SKOS Core)
>
> ITEM 5: Slash Static Configuration, Minimal
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example3
>
>      (a) Does 'example 3' configuration satisfy 'minimum requirements'?
>      (b) Is 'example 3' configuration optimal?
>      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 3' configuration?
>
> ITEM 6: Slash Static Configuration, Best Practice (Single Document)
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example4
>
>      (a) Does 'example 4' configuration satisfy 'good-practice
> requirements'?
>      (b) Is 'example 4' configuration optimal?
>      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 4' configuration?
>
>     (This could be potential configuration for DC, FOAF)
>
> ITEM 7: Slash Static Configuration, Best Practice (Multiple Documents)
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example5
>
>      (a) Does 'example 5' configuration satisfy 'good-practice
> requirements'?
>      (b) Is 'example 5' configuration optimal?
>      (c) Any potential problems with 'example 5' configuration?
>
>     (This could be potential configuration for DC, FOAF)
>
> ITEM 8: Slash Dynamic Configuration, Best Practice
>
>     See http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/VM/http-examples/#Example6
>
>      (a) Is this a good idea?
>      (b) Any thoughts on easiest way to make this happen?
>
>
> REFERENCES
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0004.html
>
>
> --
> Dr. Thomas Baker                      baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
> SUB - Goettingen State                            +49-551-39-3883
> and University Library                           +49-30-8109-9027
> Papendiek 14, 37073 Göttingen
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 11:24:05 UTC