- From: Gary Ng <Gary.Ng@networkinference.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 03:05:19 -0700
- To: "Alan Rector" <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>, <ewallace@nist.gov>, "best-practice" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, "Matthew Horridge" <mhorridge@cs.man.ac.uk>, "nick drummond" <ndrummond@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Hai Wang" <hai.wang@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Julian Seidenberg" <jms@cs.man.ac.uk>
Evan, Any chance of getting a preview of your mapping? I am very interested in this area. OMG has just announced their ODM draft [1] and I will certainly be looking into that. In fact, do you have an update on the UML profile for OWL effort? I recall that it was an agenda item on SWBPD some months ago. May be I just need to go digging the list archive. I have found standard UML to Owl needs resolution on the following: . Semantics differences between association/property/fields in UML to OWL property hierarchy, obj and datatype properties. . Treatment of subclassof semantics vs equivalentClass semantics. . Construction of complex expressions, especially in expressing restriction class as a class in it's own right. I have seen several ways of dealing with the above, but none seem to have the right balance between: expressiveness vs the mental demand in understanding the resulting diagram vs the demand of screen real estate. I have high hopes on the OMG efforts. I'd be happy to have a discussion about all these. Cheers, [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2004Sep/0006.html Gary Gary Ng, PhD <gary.ng@networkinference.com> Network Inference Ltd., 5963 La Place Court, Suite 300 Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA. Tel: +1 760 476 0650 -----Original Message----- From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Rector Sent: 05 September 2004 10:22 To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov; best-practice; Matthew Horridge; nick drummond; Hai Wang; Julian Seidenberg Subject: Re: Graphical notation from Representing Values note Ellen The notation is ad hoc borrowed partly from Natasha Noy with some variants which I have used for some time. Guus Schreiber has a specific proposal for extensions of UML to OWL. Network Inference. This note should reach Gary Ng who is on SWBP mailing list and is the appropriate contact there. It is an area in which I am very interested but have not yet detailed proposals. Regards Alan -- Alan L Rector Professor of Medical Informatics Department of Computer Science University of Manchester Manchester M13 9PL, UK TEL: +44-161-275-6188/6149/7183 FAX: +44-161-275-6236/6204 Room: 2.88a, Kilburn Building email: rector@cs.man.ac.uk web: www.cs.man.ac.uk/mig www.opengalen.org www.clinical-escience.org www.co-ode.org ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: > Hello, > > In your SWBPD note on Representing Specified Values in OWL [1] you > used a graphical notation (for figure 1) which looks interesting. Is > there any background to this notation or is it an adaptation of > RDFviz notation that you invented just for this note? I ask because I > am in the process of writing a paper on mapping from UML Class > diagrams to OWL and would like to use some similar notation the OWL > that results from my proposed mapping. Any suggestions for this would > be welcome? > > -Evan > > Evan K. Wallace > Manufacturing Systems Integration Division > NIST > ewallace@nist.gov
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 10:08:22 UTC