- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:30:55 -0800
- To: "Phil Tetlow" <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
I don’t recall our deciding to have a separate mailing list. Unless there are compelling reasons to do so, I recommend doing as all the other TFs do. Perhaps this was discussed and I missed, it for the record, what are some good reasons for having a separate mailing list? Mike -----Original Message----- From: Phil Tetlow [mailto:philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:04 AM To: Ralph R. Swick Cc: SWBPD list Subject: Re: [SE] Re: Software Engineering Task Force Ralph, Sure thing. I'll format the ToR and pass them back to you tomorrow morning. I believe that the consensus from the telecon was to establish both a separate public mailing list and a public wiki, but if protocols already exist for the establishment of such then I am personally happy to follow existing guidelines - I'll willingly take your direction on this. I would additionally appreciate your guidance on the number of external experts that can take part on a TF from individual W3C member organisations. Obviously I am experiencing a bit of a groundswell amongst my own colleagues and would like to set their expectations. Kind Regards Phil Tetlow Senior Consultant IBM Business Consulting Services Mobile. (+44) 7740 923328 "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org> To 08/12/2004 09:49 Phil Tetlow/UK/IBM@IBMGB cc "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org> Subject [SE] Re: Software Engineering Task Force At 05:41 AM 12/3/2004 -0500, Phil Tetlow wrote: >Ralph, > >I hope things as going well at the W10 meeting? yes, thanks. Sorry for the delayed reply; I'm swamped with various things at the moment, only some of which is WG-related. >At yesterday’s SWBP telecon the Software Engineering Task Force was agreed. >Therefore I would appreciate your guidance on: > >1. Posting the current terms of reference to the SWBP homepage It would help me a lot if you'd mail me a version of the content of [1] put into the WG's task force description template [2]. (This template is linked from the Background References section [3] of the WG home page but may be easy to overlook there. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Nov/0084.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/TFtemplate [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/#Background >2. Setting up a public mailing list Does the SE Task Force want a separate mailing list? Not seeing minutes yet of the 2 December meeting I don't know if having a separate list was discussed or decided. At the present, all TFs are using public-swbp-wg list with the convention of adding a token to the subject line (as Mike Uschold did in [4] and I did in this message). The HTML task force is the only exception currently, as there was already a list established for that work prior to the SWBPD WG coming into existence. (I don't feel personally that a separate list is warranted, though I don't feel so strongly as to discuss it for long. Ultimately, the entire WG is responsible for reaching consensus on any proposals from each task force.) [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Dec/0027.html >3. Setting up a public Wiki Please use the wiki at http://esw.w3.org/topic/FrontPage -Ralph
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 18:31:38 UTC