- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 15:04:59 +1000
- To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- CC: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>
Rik Cabanier wrote: > That makes sense and I think the spec should call that out. > Didn't we at some point discuss what should happen with tabindex in > symbols? It seems 'tree order' is not enough. I don't recall that discussion (doesn't mean it didn't happen) but I would expect that it should do the same thing as tabindex used inside shadow trees.
Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 05:05:45 UTC