Re: tabindex

Rik Cabanier wrote:
> That makes sense and I think the spec should call that out.
> Didn't we at some point discuss what should happen with tabindex in
> symbols? It seems 'tree order' is not enough.

I don't recall that discussion (doesn't mean it didn't happen) but I 
would expect that it should do the same thing as tabindex used inside 
shadow trees.

Received on Saturday, 16 August 2014 05:05:45 UTC