Fw: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Progress Events spec; deadline March 1

It would be good if we could provide the Webapps WG with review of the
Progress Events spec.

----- Forwarded message from Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> -----

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:28:44 -0500
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>,
 Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>,
 Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>,
 Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>,
 Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>,
 Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
Subject: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Progress Events spec; deadline March
 1

Anne would like to move the Progress Events spec to Last Call  Working
Draft (LCWD):

http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/

Note the Process Document states the following regarding the
significance/meaning of a LCWD:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call

Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document)
in the Working Draft;

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
dependencies with other groups;

* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement
is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the
technical report to later maturity levels.
]]

Additionally, a LCWD should be considered feature-complete with all
issues resolved.

We specifically request comments from the HTML WG and SVG WG.

Please send all comments to public-webapps@w3.org by March 1.

-Regards, Art Barstow

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 21:21:24 UTC