- From: SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:19:35 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-2060 (title-desc-tooltip): [1.2T-LC] title and desc example 'title-desc-tooltip.svg' [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2060 Raised by: Doug Schepers On product: Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Sep/0069.html>: [[ in the section 5.5.3 there is an example title-desc-tooltip.svg; I have some suggestions to improve this. - maybe more useful to use version 1.2 and the tiny profile and not version 1.1, because the draft ist about SVGT 1.2 and SVG 1.1 has no role attribute - if this is modified to an SVGT 1.2 example, it is useful too to use xml:id instead of id as suggested in the related section about id and xml:id - looking at the points list of #beeCell I came to the conclusion, that it is not a regular hexagon (what is of course no problem, one cannot assume, that a bee cell is really a regular hexagon), but then I do not understand the content of the meta element. Ok, the hexagon still has some symmetries, but four parameter are not sufficient to describe the hexagon (for a regular hexagon, four would be enough: center x,y, here 0,0, radius for corners, angle for one corner). Therefore without further explanation or reference to a specific namespace for hexagons it is not obvious, what the content of metadata could mean. Because there are not may samples for the use of metadata, it is useful to have it, but the relation to the parent element should be simpler to identify to have some profit from this part of the example. - could be helpful to have somewhere an informative section including some more samples with short explanations for the content of role. I think, currently for a reader without a predisposition something like role="aria:tooltip" is not obvious, how this is constructed. For example in the referenced wai-aria document this is indicated as 'Role: tooltip' Additional side note: Many examples in the draft have no title element, but the chapter about title and desc notes: "Authors should always provide at least a 'title', and preferably a 'desc', as an immediate child element to the 'svg' element within an SVG document." Well, if the examples in the draft have any educational functionality, indeed, draft authors too should at least provide a title for the svg element, if it is a complete sample and not just a document fragment or should add some '...' to indicate, that it is only a fragment ;o) Or does this mean: "Authors should always provide at least a 'title' OR primarily a 'desc' ...", because many samples have a 'desc' but no 'title'? ]]
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2008 20:20:12 UTC