Re: Guide for referencing W3C TRs

Cameron McCormack:
> Should we follow this?  Are there any particular references in the spec
> that need to be to “latest version” URLs?

I notice also that some entries in the References appendix link to
“this version” URLs that aren’t the latest version.  For example the
link for Namespaces in XML 1.0 is to the 1999 Rec.  Is there any reason
why we shouldn’t update this to refer to the second edition Rec from

Cameron McCormack ≝

Received on Saturday, 9 August 2008 06:37:34 UTC