- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:43:55 +1000
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
I came across this mail of mine that hasn’t been followed up: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2006OctDec/0358.html In the Java bindings appendix, the SVG-specific interfaces all live in the org.w3c.svg package. This is inconsistent with SVG 1.1, where the org.w3c.dom.svg package is used. Is this deliberate? JSR-226 uses org.w3c.dom.svg. Could someone who has access to JSR-287 see what package it uses? I noticed this just now because in the uDOM appendix there is currently this statement: The SVG uDOM will use the same Java package names as the upcoming SVG 1.2 Full DOM (e.g. org.w3c.dom, org.w3c.dom.events, org.w3c.dom.svg). which doesn’t match with what’s in the Java bindings appendix. Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 4 July 2008 01:44:48 UTC