public-svg-issues@w3.org from July 2019 by author

Alex Inkin via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 1 July)
• [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 1 July)

Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Make "show" widget in element definitions boxes play nicely with screen readers (#714) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Decide what to do with zoom and pan (#56) (Sunday, 28 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Clean up definitions around transforms on root SVG element (#360) (Sunday, 28 July)
• [svgwg] Remove outdated note on hit-testing and root element (#718) (Saturday, 27 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: Remove outdated note on hit-testing and root element (#718) marked as CSS Consistency (Saturday, 27 July)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by AmeliaBR (Saturday, 27 July)
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Expanded note on server configuration and SVGZ (Saturday, 27 July)
• Closed: [svgwg] A separate MIME type for svgz files is needed (#701) (Saturday, 27 July)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 15 July)
• Closed: [svgwg] Values in SVGZoomAndPan and SVGUnitTypes should be accessible to javascript (#291) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Values in SVGZoomAndPan and SVGUnitTypes should be accessible to javascript (#291) (Sunday, 14 July)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Expanded note on server configuration and SVGZ (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Make "show" widget in element definitions boxes play nicely with screen readers (#714) (Sunday, 14 July)
• [svgwg] Merged Pull Request: Make "show" widget in element definitions boxes play nicely with screen readers (Sunday, 14 July)
• [svgwg] new commits pushed by AmeliaBR (Sunday, 14 July)
• Closed: [svgwg] Make "show" widget in element definitions boxes play nicely with screen readers (#110) (Sunday, 14 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Make "show" widget in element definitions boxes play nicely with screen readers (#714) (Sunday, 14 July)
• [svgwg] How should ResizeObserver work for SVG layout elements? (#713) (Wednesday, 10 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: How should ResizeObserver work for SVG layout elements? (#713) marked as CSS Consistency (Wednesday, 10 July)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Closed: [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] xlink:href in <animate> doesn't work in sourceless iframes (#700) (Saturday, 6 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: xlink:href in <animate> doesn't work in sourceless iframes (#700) marked as HTML Consistency (Saturday, 6 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Saturday, 6 July)
• Re: [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Friday, 5 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) marked as Text chapter (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVG no longer defines any attributes as required (#710) (Friday, 5 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: SVG no longer defines any attributes as required (#710) marked as Basic shapes chapter (Friday, 5 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVG no longer defines any attributes as required (#710) (Friday, 5 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) marked as Agenda+ (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement has a clashing definition of href (#709) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Closed: [svgwg] SVGAElement has a clashing definition of href (#709) (Thursday, 4 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Tracking issue for the renaming of HTMLOrSVGElement to something inclusive for MathML (#708) (Wednesday, 3 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: Tracking issue for the renaming of HTMLOrSVGElement to something inclusive for MathML (#708) marked as Basic Data Types and Interfaces chapter (Wednesday, 3 July)
• Re: [svgwg] A separate MIME type for svgz files is needed (#701) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 1 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) marked as Document structure chapter (Monday, 1 July)

Behdad Esfahbod via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Monday, 15 July)

Brian Birtles via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) (Tuesday, 23 July)

Brian Kardell via GitHub

• [svgwg] Tracking issue for the renaming of HTMLOrSVGElement to something inclusive for MathML (#708) (Wednesday, 3 July)

Chris Little via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Tuesday, 9 July)

CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] How should ResizeObserver work for SVG layout elements? (#713) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Defer onfocusin and onfocusout (#715) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Monday, 29 July)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] xlink:href in <animate>, <use>, etc. doesn't work in sourceless iframes (#700) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Which CSS concepts should be supported in presentation attributes? (#681) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Values in SVGZoomAndPan and SVGUnitTypes should be accessible to javascript (#291) (Monday, 1 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Decide what to do with zoom and pan (#56) (Monday, 1 July)

Cyril Concolato via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) (Tuesday, 23 July)

Dirk Schulze via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) (Wednesday, 24 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Typo `referrerpolicy` content attribute type definition (#712) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: Typo `referrerpolicy` content attribute type definition (#712) marked as Needs editing (Tuesday, 23 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: Defer onfocusin and onfocusout (#715) marked as Agenda+ (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• [svgwg] Issue: Discard "discard" elements (#717) marked as SVG Animations (Tuesday, 23 July)

Domenic Denicola via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] SVG no longer defines any attributes as required (#710) (Friday, 5 July)

Edvard Thörnros via GitHub

• [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) (Friday, 19 July)

ExE Boss via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Tracking issue for the renaming of HTMLOrSVGElement to something inclusive for MathML (#708) (Wednesday, 3 July)

Fredrik Söderqvist via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 15 July)

Kagami Sascha Rosylight via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Sunday, 7 July)

Luke Bjerring via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) (Thursday, 4 July)
• [svgwg] SVGAElement has a clashing definition of href (#709) (Thursday, 4 July)

Michael\[tm\] Smith via GitHub

• [svgwg] SVG no longer defines any attributes as required (#710) (Friday, 5 July)

Philip Rogers via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Discard "discard" elements (#717) (Friday, 19 July)

Robert Longson via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Typo `referrerpolicy` content attribute type definition (#712) (Tuesday, 23 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Referencing SVGs through USE from other domains (#707) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] SVGAElement implements two conflicting interfaces (#312) (Monday, 15 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Sunday, 7 July)
• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Saturday, 6 July)

Ryosuke Niwa via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] xlink:href in <animate>, <use>, etc. doesn't work in sourceless iframes (#700) (Wednesday, 17 July)

Sairus Patel via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] [svg-native] Decide whether reusable graphical elements are needed (#689) (Monday, 15 July)

Sebastian Zartner via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Friday, 12 July)
• Re: [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Sunday, 7 July)
• [svgwg] text-overflow property is missing from attribute index (#711) (Friday, 5 July)

shallawa via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] Revert change from SVGRect/SVGPoint/SVGMatrix to DOM equivalents (#706) (Tuesday, 16 July)

Takeshi Kurosawa via GitHub

• [svgwg] Defer onfocusin and onfocusout (#715) (Sunday, 14 July)
• [svgwg] Pull Request: Make "show" widget in element definitions boxes play nicely with screen readers (Sunday, 14 July)
• [svgwg] Typo `referrerPolicy` content attribute type definition (#712) (Sunday, 7 July)

tatarize via GitHub

• Re: [svgwg] A separate MIME type for svgz files is needed (#701) (Tuesday, 2 July)
• Re: [svgwg] A separate MIME type for svgz files is needed (#701) (Tuesday, 2 July)

Last message date: Monday, 29 July 2019 20:57:10 UTC