- From: Dirk Schulze via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 06:56:55 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
@FredTheDino @progers At this point the text in question is part of an early editors draft. Having implementation feedback is valuable. From what I get: 1. There is no declarative solution (so it is _not_ redundant) and an authors needs to use JS. But... 2. it adds a significant implementation burden on Blink with possible performance implications. @cconcolato Do you think a declarative solution would be required over a scripted solution? Is the use case strong enough to keep `<discard>` in the specification given the feedback from one implementer? -- GitHub Notification of comment by dirkschulze Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/717#issuecomment-514505805 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2019 06:56:56 UTC