- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:51:32 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
> Would you be open to using `correspondingAnimation` instead of source, to mirror the SVG terminology? Or is that uncomfortably verbose for a feature that you hope to have wider use? @AmeliaBR It's pretty verbose and remembering the double 'r' in corresponding is going to trip up non-native English speakers everywhere. On the other hand, `source` might be a bit too ambiguous, so `sourceAnimation` ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/206#issuecomment-234441832 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 02:51:51 UTC