- From: Alex Danilo via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 04:36:32 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
Hi @AmeliaBR yes, I know it's too late, that's why I apologized for not paying attention. Performance we can speculate about, but memory is another thing altogether. With the DAG model, if I design a nice intricate graphic (e.g. a snowflake) with 1,000 nodes and reference it 1,000 times in my snow village, I get 2,000 DOM nodes of memory consumed vs. 1,001,000 which is fairly considerable. It's just a bit strange to formalize a 'mistake' in some implementations... In any case, event handling from an implementation that implements the DAG correctly doesn't seem to have caused existing implementers any difficulty in the past. I agree this will have little effect on rendering. Anyway, we'll see what implementers do over time. I do like the concept of bringing Shadow DOM into SVG, just necessarily via <use> which already worked IMHO. -- GitHub Notification of comment by adanilo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/206#issuecomment-234835608 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 25 July 2016 04:36:41 UTC