- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 02:27:17 +0000
- To: public-svg-issues@w3.org
@birtles The `<use>` tree was always open in the SVG spec. It has just never got a lot of attention in practice because Firefox didn't implement it that way! I like your suggestion of sub-classing `Animation` to define the mirrored copies. Would you be open to using `correspondingAnimation` instead of `source`, to mirror the SVG terminology? Or is that uncomfortably verbose for a feature that you hope to have wider use? -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/pull/206#issuecomment-234438695 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 July 2016 02:27:26 UTC