- From: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:39:45 -0500
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, SVG-A11y TF <public-svg-a11y@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <4D0C4783-AA58-42B1-BE00-9EE94FAFE49B@gmail.com>
We discussed g- before and people did not like it. Again, either way is fine. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger > On Apr 29, 2016, at 12:24 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Apr 28, 2016, at 8:36 PM, Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com <mailto:richschwer@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I am fine with changing it but with the prefix it is a mouthful. > > If you want it shorter, the other abbreviation change to consider is whether the prefix is too long. > > There is no precedent for non-abbreviations in prefixing (dpub- is already an accepted abbreviation) so you could consider a shorter prefix > > g- > gr- > gfx- > > etc. > > >> Now would be the time to change it. We can post it like does anyone object to the name change and just do it if no objections. I don't want to take meeting time for that. >> >> Rich >> >> Rich >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Apr 28, 2016, at 9:34 PM, Amelia Bellamy-Royds <amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com <mailto:amelia.bellamy.royds@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> If there is consensus on the main ARIA working group to go with the longer name, I don't have a problem with that. In the SVG Accessibility Task Force, we did discuss a number of variations on the name and settled on graphics-doc as a compromise between concise and comprehensible. >>> >>> I would ask for a quick resolution, though (i.e., comments on mailing list this week & discussion at the next ARIA telcon), so we can update all the specs sooner rather than later, and definitely before the next heartbeat drafts. >>> >>> ~Amelia >>> >>> On 28 April 2016 at 19:14, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com <mailto:jcraig@apple.com>> wrote: >>> While reviewing a related thread, I noticed the "graphics-doc" role should be "graphics-document"... With the unfortunate exception of the "img" role (I admit missing this), ARIA has avoided inconsistent abbreviation. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/#graphics-doc <http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/#graphics-doc> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
Received on Friday, 29 April 2016 22:40:15 UTC