Re: Towards Solid Lite

po 4. 12. 2023 v 14:59 odesílatel David Mason <vid_w3c@zooid.org> napsal:

>
> Hi again all,
>
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 09:52:08PM +0100, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> >    p** 10. 11. 2023 v**12:15 odes**latel Pete Edwards
> >      ***[2]
> https://github.com/solid-contrib/specification-tests/blob/main/README.md#creating-a-script-for-a-ci-workflow
> >      - how to run tests with your own manifest/spec
> >
> >    Thanks alot for the brilliant Test Suite, Pete!
> >    I've started my journey on trying to pass the tests, unsure what the
> best
> >    route is.
> >    So I just picked something, and started with CRUD tests.
> >    At the moment I have got up to 2 of 9.
> >    Quite fun to try and increase coverage.** 100% would be nice if
> possible.
> >    Any suggestions for plan of attack welcome!
>
> I think most people would want to work on Solid Lite specs (or tests in my
> case), rather than the extensive "Karate" tests. Would it make sense to
> provide
> a ready to go "manifest/spec" as a profile? What I'd particularly like to
> do is
> extract the tests themselves (in their "karate" format) so I coud convert
> them
> into mixed prose/BDD phrases (Karate's phrases appear to be a programming
> language, rather than something like ordinary language to help someone
> understand the "whys" and "hows" of implementing the spec, and persons like
> myself, who avoid programs with names like "karate", "gatling" might want a
> more neutral approach).
>
> I'd be happy if there could be a meeting talking about how to move this
> forward. I'm a bit stuck on a couple decisions in my implementation.
>

Solid lite is still very small, so it would make sense to reuse as much of
the work from the test suite as possible.  Also the test suite team might
have some views on the evolution.  Not opposed to different testing
strategies, but there needs to be someone to do the work, and we are thinly
spread, at this point.


>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
>