Re: Next steps of FPWD for Social API?

I'd be happy to contribute as Harry suggests!

Aaron


On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:38 AM Bassetti, Ann <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>
wrote:

>  I'd be pleased with Aaron and Jessica!
>
>  I'd also strongly like to suggest Amy as editor -- either by herself, or
> with others. As we can see from her summary of the meeting, she's an
> excellent compiler of concepts and a good writer.
>
>   -- Ann
>
>  Ann Bassetti
>    *From: *Harry Halpin
> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 12, 2015 7:36 AM
> *To: *public-socialweb@w3.org
> *Subject: *Next steps of FPWD for Social API?
>
> Usually when faced with writing the first draft of a FPWD, it requires
> having a rough draft of some pre-existing work. Now, given that we are
> blessed with three pre-existing designs and that after the Paris F2F the
> various people are seeing the core similarities/differences, would now
> be a good time to see if a joint draft between the three candidates
> could be produced, with one or two neutral editors.
>
> Would Tysekia, Aaron, and someone from SoLiD be up for it?
>
> Any opinions? Volunteers?
>
> Positive: It would force each of the similarities/differences to be
> worked out one by one. For example:
> Micropub - form-encoding and extensibility
> SoLiD - Working with ActivityStreams
>
> Negative: Might create a "Frankenstein" monster that no-one will implement.
>
> My advise to avoid the negative would be to use the user-stories to
> guide us and 'pave the cowpaths' in existing specs where there are
> similarities, keeping the spec minimalistic.
>
> cheers,
> harry
>
>
>
>
>
>