Re: Next steps of FPWD for Social API?

Hey Ann, and everyone,

Thanks for your confidence in me! I'd be happy to coordinate editing the
spec with Aaron, Jessica and someone from SoLiD. I've been thinking about
it, and I can make enough time for this, but I haven't done something like
this before and I'll appreciate all the help I can get :)

Amy
On May 12, 2015 9:38 AM, "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com> wrote:

>  I'd be pleased with Aaron and Jessica!
>
>  I'd also strongly like to suggest Amy as editor -- either by herself, or
> with others. As we can see from her summary of the meeting, she's an
> excellent compiler of concepts and a good writer.
>
>   -- Ann
>
>  Ann Bassetti
>    *From: *Harry Halpin
> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 12, 2015 7:36 AM
> *To: *public-socialweb@w3.org
> *Subject: *Next steps of FPWD for Social API?
>
> Usually when faced with writing the first draft of a FPWD, it requires
> having a rough draft of some pre-existing work. Now, given that we are
> blessed with three pre-existing designs and that after the Paris F2F the
> various people are seeing the core similarities/differences, would now
> be a good time to see if a joint draft between the three candidates
> could be produced, with one or two neutral editors.
>
> Would Tysekia, Aaron, and someone from SoLiD be up for it?
>
> Any opinions? Volunteers?
>
> Positive: It would force each of the similarities/differences to be
> worked out one by one. For example:
> Micropub - form-encoding and extensibility
> SoLiD - Working with ActivityStreams
>
> Negative: Might create a "Frankenstein" monster that no-one will implement.
>
> My advise to avoid the negative would be to use the user-stories to
> guide us and 'pave the cowpaths' in existing specs where there are
> similarities, keeping the spec minimalistic.
>
> cheers,
> harry
>
>
>
>
>
>