W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > May 2015

RE: Next steps of FPWD for Social API?

From: Jaakko Korhonen <jaakko@okf.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:39:19 +0300
Message-ID: <DUB125-W8106EA2279337426C179EBCDA0@phx.gbl>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
I should have some time for supporting the editing work.

Cheers,
Jaakko

> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 01:35:43 -0400
> From: hhalpin@w3.org
> To: public-socialweb@w3.org
> Subject: Next steps of FPWD for Social API?
> 
> Usually when faced with writing the first draft of a FPWD, it requires
> having a rough draft of some pre-existing work. Now, given that we are
> blessed with three pre-existing designs and that after the Paris F2F the
> various people are seeing the core similarities/differences, would now
> be a good time to see if a joint draft between the three candidates
> could be produced, with one or two neutral editors.
> 
> Would Tysekia, Aaron, and someone from SoLiD be up for it?
> 
> Any opinions? Volunteers?
> 
> Positive: It would force each of the similarities/differences to be
> worked out one by one. For example:
> Micropub - form-encoding and extensibility
> SoLiD - Working with ActivityStreams
> 
> Negative: Might create a "Frankenstein" monster that no-one will implement.
> 
> My advise to avoid the negative would be to use the user-stories to
> guide us and 'pave the cowpaths' in existing specs where there are
> similarities, keeping the spec minimalistic.
> 
>    cheers,
>          harry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
 		 	   		  
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 07:39:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:26:17 UTC