W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Removing Activity Types not used by User Stories

From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:07:40 +0100
Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org
Message-Id: <FF02E3C8-1751-4D3D-98AD-F65F3F5F64F5@bblfish.net>
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

> On 26 Mar 2015, at 15:28, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Can we please keep the discussion on this thread related to the original subject? This meta-discussion is not helpful right now and can be moved to a separate thread. The original question is asking if we can remove certain specific items from the vocabulary that are not supported by the user stories.

Given that RDF is extensible, and those relations  can be placed in another ontology, and used in any case,
the answer is pretty obviously yes. The reasons you gave for removing them seemed pretty reasonable. 

Henry

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:08:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:48:21 UTC