Re: Removing Activity Types not used by User Stories from henry.story@bblfish.net on 2015-03-26 (public-socialweb@w3.org from March 2015)

From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 20:07:40 +0100
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org
Message-Id: <FF02E3C8-1751-4D3D-98AD-F65F3F5F64F5@bblfish.net>

> On 26 Mar 2015, at 15:28, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Can we please keep the discussion on this thread related to the original subject? This meta-discussion is not helpful right now and can be moved to a separate thread. The original question is asking if we can remove certain specific items from the vocabulary that are not supported by the user stories.

Given that RDF is extensible, and those relations  can be placed in another ontology, and used in any case,
the answer is pretty obviously yes. The reasons you gave for removing them seemed pretty reasonable. 

Henry

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 19:08:11 UTC