- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:28:27 -0700
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: public-socialweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CABP7Rbf5Nr5ypNXF7hfZcTZxtRs4fRJB2hBGOkaOnv5ORJJO9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Can we please keep the discussion on this thread related to the original subject? This meta-discussion is not helpful right now and can be moved to a separate thread. The original question is asking if we can remove certain specific items from the vocabulary that are not supported by the user stories. On Mar 26, 2015 7:00 AM, "henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > > On 25 Mar 2015, at 10:42, Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > > > hello elf. > > > > On 2015-03-25 10:21, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: > >> IMO we really better focus in WG on other issues, one very relevant here > >> ISSUE-16: better separate grammar/vocabulary and improved spec structure > >> https://www.w3.org/Social/track/issues/16 > > > > of course i have to pitch in here because that was my proposal a little > while ago. i think it's clear that AS2 needs to be open and needs a solid > model for extensibility. what AS1 called the "base schema" simply should be > the first and w3c-blessed extension that implementations should support. > > > > in my mind, AS1 had a better structure because the spec itself had a > very basic set (mostly the basic AS grammar) of verbs and object types and > properties, and then the base schema extended this in a separate spec. > > > > if we want to be extensible i think we should eat our own dogfood and do > what AS1 did: separate AS grammar and vocabulary, and treat the "base > vocabulary" as an extension. not only would we validate our own > extensibility model, we would also create a blueprint for those who want to > create their own extensions. > > That has already been done by choosing RDF in choosing JSON-LD. > The extensibility is already defined: it's RDF extensibility. > > > > > > btw, for those interested in declarative extensibility: i just finished > the ASDL experiment of converting the AS1 base schema into a structured > list, and our general approach is to treat this no different than any other > possible extension of the AS1 core. here's ASDL's current playground, but > please keep in mind that this is all about AS1: > > > > https://github.com/dret/ASDL/tree/master/0.1 > > > > cheers, > > > > dret. > > > > -- > > erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 | > > | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | > > | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret | > > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 14:29:04 UTC