W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-socialweb@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Demos of API Candidates during Face 2 Face

From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:27:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CAGBSGjozJGTVetFnfgbTkMWLxVofDoRmsXBhma1Dp9t=GW15oA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, public-socialweb@w3.org
I see little benefit in watching videos during a face-to-face meeting. We
can watch videos any time. The point of a face-to-face meeting is to do
things that are better done in person. Remote participation via video
conferencing is a good compromise for those who can't make it to the
meeting in person.

Aaron


On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:16 AM Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 03/16/2015 01:42 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> > On 03/16/2015 01:30 PM, henry.story@bblfish.net wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 14 Mar 2015, at 17:06, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 03/14/2015 12:35 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> >>>> Howdy,
> >>>>
> >>>> Tantek added to wiki very cool agenda point about demos of API
> >>>> Candidates. Of course he proposed restricting it to ones running
> >>>> on People's actual websites but I would like to *also* have demos
> >>>> of existing prototypes beyond personal websites!
> >>>
> >>> I would support a demo of any API in any website that could be a
> >>> candidate, no restricted to personal websites, as long
> >>>
> >>> So, demo'ing the existing Twitter API is useless, but demo'ing IBM
> >>> Connections API or the LDP work done by Crosscloud makes sense :)
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to have a large screen in the room to which
> >> one can connect a Skype session, so that people available remotely
> >> can demonstrate something? Otherwise I suppose I can put a few
> >> videos together on youtube.
> > Henry, I recommend you prepare some videos anyways, so even if we endup
> > in IRC only mode it will still kind of work!
> >
>
> I'm sure videos could be played and we can reserve time, but I know some
> folks will want links to a live website. Can we get both?
>
> That would be great!
>
>    cheers,
>       harry
>
> >
>
>
Received on Monday, 16 March 2015 16:28:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 8 December 2016 15:48:20 UTC