Re: Social syntax: Data model, Serialization(s), Vocabulary(ies)

Elf Pavlik,

I think the original page was to consider some possibilities for ways to 
serialize social data.

At this point, we're well on our way to standardizing Activity Streams 
2.0 as the "social data syntax" output from our working group.

Is there a reason that we would refer to a bunch of other things on this 
page instead? From my point of view, the "Social syntax" page should be 
about AS2.0.

-Evan

On 2015-02-18 01:52 PM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I started reworking Social syntax wiki page
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_syntax
>
> I found previous content pretty confusing and moved it to
> https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_syntax/Patterns
> mentioning it on very top of that page!
>
> I will also try to dig out of mailing list couple of threads where we
> discussed those issues in a past.
>
> As you can see on the new page, when we discuss for example
> microformats, we often lack clarity if we talk about vocabulary terms it
> defines, or data model it builds around or one of its official
> serializations (HTML and JSON based)
>
> At some point we may want to merge/move some of that stuff to Syntax
> Comparison page but first I see need to clarify which of those 3 aspects
> we try to compare there...
>
> Cheers!
>

Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 18:56:53 UTC