- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:22:04 -0800
- To: team-annotation <team-annotation@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUF3Ohjo0-Oh2k5apCYKYi6Dsw846a+OErfRJbC4hfFMNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, There are several stories that seem to have a great deal of overlap with the scope of the Annotation Working Group. It would be great to work together on these rather than co-inventing separate solutions to the same problem at the same time in the same standards body. In particular, I'd like to point out: ## User Comments about things: * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Responses * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Answering_a_question * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Product_issue_reports * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Integration_:_Adding_recommendations_to_bespoke_software * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Integration_:_Adding_comments_to_bespoke_software * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Reply_in_a_discussion * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Comment_on_content * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Comments_And_Showing_Comments ## User Tagging: * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Person_tagging * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Location_tagging * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Like_content * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Content_location_tagging * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Report_content * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Tagging_a_Post * https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Liking_And_Showing_Likes Thanks! Rob On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:32 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ < perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote: > On 02/18/2015 05:23 PM, Evan Prodromou wrote: > > So, per our discussion yesterday, we're no longer taking new user > > stories. It's time to start doing +1/0/-1 voting. > > > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories > > > > We'll close this out next week at midnight Tuesday EST, so please take > > the time to review this week. > Evan, I needed to add comment under :Reply in a discussion" story, > motivated by your question. It ended up *out of context* after us > experimenting with section/no-section, linked groupings and all that > stuff... > > I hope it clarifies the difference and shows real world requirement > commonly used in the wild. Please reconsider your -1, Thx! > > > https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_API/User_stories#Reply_in_a_discussion > > -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 19:22:32 UTC