- From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 19:41:25 +0100
- To: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 18:41:44 UTC
On 02/18/2015 05:34 PM, Erik Wilde wrote: > hello elf. > > On 2015-02-18 8:26 , ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote: >>> should we also have a story that looks at the same setup but with both >>> activity types from the core vocabulary? it could be either "like" and >>> "respond" (subtypes) or "like" and "favorite". basically anything where >>> the vocabulary definition implies a relationship between activity types >>> that probably should be part of the processing model. >> +1 > > only that we cannot add new stories anymore.... here you go :) https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_syntax/User_Stories#Proposed
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 18:41:44 UTC