Re: story or not?

Hi Erik,
I believe Activity Streams 1.0 at one stage allowed multiple verbs which 
addressed the issue below fairly simply but provided other complications 
(and so was removed). With json-ld types, the association is not held in 
the data itself so it's more complex to process. Definitely think this is 
an important story.
Rgds,
-Bill.
_________________________________________
Bill Looby
Software Architect, Dublin Software Lab, IBM Ireland
IBM UK & Ireland Technical Staff Member
Phone (Internal) : 515129
Phone (External) : +353 1 8155129
_________________________________________
IBM Ireland Product Distribution Limited registered in Ireland with number 
92815.  Registered office: IBM House, Shelbourne Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 
4.



From:   ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
To:     Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>, "public-socialweb@w3.org" 
<public-socialweb@w3.org>
Date:   11/02/2015 08:07
Subject:        Re: story or not?



On 02/11/2015 12:14 AM, Erik Wilde wrote:
> hello.
hi Erik :)

> 
> i am wondering if anybody has an opinion on whether the following script
> qualifies as a user story and i should add it, or whether people think
> it's something different. it's about the processing model aspect i was
> talking about in today's call.
> 
> - the vocabulary currently has a "like" verb that is defined to be a
> subclass of the "respond" verb.
> 
> - let's assume a scenario has created a "likealot" verb that is a
> subclass of the "like" verb.
> 
> - user alice is listening to activities somewhere in an AS ecosystem and
> has set up a filter that is asking for "respond" activities.
> 
> - user bob posts a "like" and a "likealot" activity somewhere into this
> ecosystem.
> 
> - alice now sees what?
> 
> well, that last part is not really a "story" and i think we have (at
> least) four choices:
> 
> 1. alice will see nothing because bob's activities are not "respond"
> 2. alice see only the "like" because the core vocab says it is "respond"
> 3. alice sees "like" and "likealot" because they are both "respond"
> 4. we cannot tell what alice sees because the spec doesn't tell us.
> 
> i am curious to hear what people think. personally, i would hope we end
> up with 3, and then the next interesting question is how to make that
> happen in an interoperable way. but first i am wondering whether that's
> a story at all, or just by permanent fixation on the processing model.
sounds like a really great story to me! maybe not directly for API but
we should still capture it somewhere! maybe something like
https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialwg/Social_Data/User_stories


i think we should discuss query / filters in general!
once again i would like to bring your attention to Hydra CG, where also
Linked Data Fragments undergo development http://www.hydra-cg.com/


*
https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=query&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public_FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-hydra


* https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-hydra/2014Sep/0051.html


cheers!

[attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Bill Looby/Ireland/IBM]