- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 22:43:41 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
> On 24 Apr 2015, at 22:06, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:20 AM, henry.story@bblfish.net > <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > [snip] >>> >>> And only the JSON-LD is normative. The Turtle and RDFa examples are >>> illustrative. >> >> JSON-LD is an RDF format is it not? > [snip] > > http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#introduction: > > "JSON-LD is designed to be usable directly as JSON, > with no knowledge of RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. It is > also designed to be usable as RDF, if desired..." > > Section 9 of the same document deals with how to process JSON-LD as > RDF, but JSON-LD itself does not require the use of RDF. It is "designed to be useable by...." But the fact that we have mappings to RDFa, Turtle can only make sense if we are serious about the RDF part too. Otherwise why bother? > > - James Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 20:44:14 UTC