"henry.story@bblfish.net" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote on 04/24/2015 09:25:28 AM: > Btw. I think there are quite a few LDP paging implementations too. Quite a bit of work went into LDP Paging so it might be interesting to look into it but that claim is bogus. The LDP Paging spec is stuck in CR because we can't find the minimum two implementations required to exit CR. The problem seems to be two folds: 1) people are only interested in paging as a mechanism to go through search/query results which we currently don't have, 2) people want more control from the client, such as over the size of the page and sort order, which the current draft doesn't provide. LDP Paging isn't dead because people want to keep working on it for LDPnext but for now I wouldn't claim that this is a reference this WG ought to align with. -- Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM Software Group
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2015 14:22:39 UTC