- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:45:49 -0700
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Cc: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, public-socialweb@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 16:46:16 UTC
Yes that's exactly the plan. The jsonld context would do the heavy lifting here. On Apr 23, 2015 9:44 AM, "hhalpin" <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > On 2015-04-23 06:53, Renato Iannella wrote: > >> On 23 Apr 2015, at 1:41 am, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> While this is helpful, the use of the namespace prefix is irritating. >>> >> >> Why is it irritating? >> > > My guess is some developers - particularly those who aren't using RDF > somewhere mentally - don't like using namespaces, and often accidently > leave them out. I know I've seen that in some usages of FOAF by non-RDF > aware developers in the past. > > Would there be a way of sorting this out in the JSON-LD context, so that > RDF-aware processors could properly namespace the vCard vocabulary usage > while your ordinary JSON developer on the street would just process without > namespaces (since they wouldn't be resolving them to begin with)? > > >> Cheers... >> Renato Iannella >> Semantic Identity >> http://semanticidentity.com >> Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 >> > > -- > > Harry Halpin (W3C/MIT) harry@w3.org >
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2015 16:46:16 UTC