Re: Activity Streams URI Namespace

On 10/30/2014 08:13 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On 28 Okt 2014 at 01:36, Renato Iannella wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 22:59, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that has technical consequences... namely more HTTP requests, lower
>>> cache-hit rates, etc. What's the reasoning behind your suggestion to use
>>> distinct resources instead of fragment identifiers?
>>
>> There are always tradeoffs between the two approaches:
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp- vocab-pub/
> 
> Right. I was actually interested what you tried to optimize for when you
> suggested to use paths instead of fragment identifiers. I suggested to use
> fragment identifiers because I expect the vocabulary to be (and remain)
> quite small and I wanted to minimize the number of necessary HTTP requests.

FYI

http://socialwg.indiewebcamp.com/irc/social/2014-10-27/line/1414433862098

RESOLVED: adoption of "http://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#" as
namespace for Activity Streams 2.0