Re: Activity Streams URI Namespace

On 10/30/2014 08:13 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> On 28 Okt 2014 at 01:36, Renato Iannella wrote:
>>> On 24 Oct 2014, at 22:59, Markus Lanthaler <>
> wrote:
>>> Now that has technical consequences... namely more HTTP requests, lower
>>> cache-hit rates, etc. What's the reasoning behind your suggestion to use
>>> distinct resources instead of fragment identifiers?
>> There are always tradeoffs between the two approaches:
>> vocab-pub/
> Right. I was actually interested what you tried to optimize for when you
> suggested to use paths instead of fragment identifiers. I suggested to use
> fragment identifiers because I expect the vocabulary to be (and remain)
> quite small and I wanted to minimize the number of necessary HTTP requests.


RESOLVED: adoption of "" as
namespace for Activity Streams 2.0

Received on Thursday, 30 October 2014 19:23:54 UTC